The 2013 Repeater Upgrade project is about updating the current W2CXM 146.61 repeater hardware to a more modern set of hardware. As of November 2nd, 2013, we have the following at the repeater site:
The first question is obviously: “If it ain't broke, why fix it?” Well, while technically true that the repeater is “not broken,” it's not exactly in the best shape either. The list of current issues:
Well, given the list of problems in the Background section, it would seem the primary issue is that of the hammering. To address this, we were prepared to spend on the order of $100 to purchase the additional equipment to enable PL enc/dec on the current repeater. During our research, it turned out we have the opportunity to replace the ARH-351 with a MASTR-II, which is a significant upgrade. This upgrade would accomplish the following:
The total cost to W2CXM to upgrade the ARH-351 to a MASTR-II is $160. During one of the weekly club meetings in mid-October 2013, it was decided that a 60% increase in cost for a significant improvement to the W2CXM repeater that will last long into the future was worth it, so we have released the funds from the club account to KD2SL, who is helping us with the upgrade. A big thank you to Kevin (KD2SL) for doing this! The $160 represents only parts cost—Kevin is volunteering his time!
Given that we are already upgrading the RF part of the repeater, it seems reasonable for us to upgrade the repeater controller as well at the same time. KD2SL has requested that we either ship him the current RC-850 repeater controller so he can integrate it with the MASTR-II, or provide him with a different repeater controller for integration and testing.
It seems reasonable to upgrade the entire repeater infrastructure for two main reasons:
Thanks to the generosity of TCARA, we now have a donated RLC-2 repeater controller. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, the RLC-2 isn't coming online in a straightforward manner. We're not convinced that it's dead, but it's not going to be an easy fight.
During the last half of October 2013, there has been much discussion in email threads as well as on one weekly W2CXM net about the potential candidates for repeater controllers, as well as the desired feature list. The candidate list as as follows:
The opinion of two local repeater builders, N2PYI and KD2SL, is that the SCom series is good. KD2SL suggests that the Arcom RC210 is also quite good, and the NHRC is “okay.” However, none of those statements directly address the feature list we might want. To do this, we look to the table below:
|Feature||Arcom RC210||NHRC-7||SCom 7330||IDOM+Pi||RC-850|
|Audio Delay Support||YES||NO||YES||NO||NO|
|Autopatch (without using radio port)||YES||NO||NO||NO||Broken|
|ADC Ports||8||None||3||ADC on I2C/SPI||NO|
|CTCSS Support (PL enc/dec)||YES||YES||YES||On MASTR-II||NO|
|DTMF Decode (for control)||YES||YES||YES||NO||YES|
|DVR (Voice Recording)||YES||NO||Over RS-232||Use ECHOTEST||NO|
|DVR Playback (for testing)||YES||NO||NO||Use ECHOTEST||NO|
|Out-of-Box EchoLink/IRLP Support||NO||NO||NO||YES||NO|
|GPIO Ports||5 in, 7 out||None||4 in, 4 out||On Pi||NO|
|Multiple Radio Ports (For Cross-Band)||3 Ports||2 Ports||3 Ports||NO||NO|
|Programming Interface||Windows over DTMF||DTMF||RS-232/DTMF||USB3||DTMF|
|Remote Base Support||YES1||NO||NO||NO||NO|
|Cost4 (w/ Rack Mount)||$2952||$339||$479||$367||$0|
1The Arcom RC210 supports Kenwood, Icom, Yaesu, and Doug Hall RBI-1 protocols for remote bases.
2Does not include the autopatch ($149) or the audio delay ($35) modules. Can add an additional battery backup for the real time clock ($49.95). Total of all bells & whistles: $529.
3The ID-O-MATIC III is USB-programmed, and the Pi is programmed over SSH/whatever you feel like. We can actually plug the ID-O-MATIC III into the Pi and program remotely. That sounds pretty great.
4Only the IDOM+Pi option includes the cost of the Echolink/IRLP computer/embedded computer.
One big remaining challenge is getting a phone line and network connection up at the repeater site. On the 10/30/2013 W2CXM net we came to the consensus that we should upgrade the controller even without these connections being guaranteed. Having the capability to use them allows for growth into the future, and none of these problems are insurmountable, even in the near future.
UPDATE 12/11/2013: We have provisions for a network connection up on the repeater site, thanks to WB2EMS.
Pre-IDOM+Pi, the Arcom RC210 was the good-looking choice.
If we're willing to “cheat” and use the internet to get our Cross-band Operation and DVR features, we're willing to move the GPIO/ADC to the Raspberry PI, and we're willing to forgo the Autopatch, we can actually get what we want from the ID-O-MATIC III + Raspberry Pi with a significant savings over the Arcom RC210.
This is especially important if we consider the fact that we're probably going to use a Raspberry Pi for Echolink/IRLP. The cost of that can be quite steep, even though the cost of Pi is only $35. After you buy the power adapter, the SD card, the IRLP card, etc etc, we're looking at a cost of about $270, if this site is representative: http://www.irlp.net/pi/.
Here's the bottom line: If we're willing to offload some of the features we want to a Raspberry Pi, instead of being on the controller itself, we could probably get away with an ID-O-MATIC III as our “controller” of choice. It's not going to talk at us, but if you're not a fan of a chatty repeater, that's probably okay!
|PiIRLP||Raspberry Pi + Echolink/IRLP||$270|
This gets us pretty much everything, save autopatch, for _less_ than we'd need for the Arcom RC210 (if we also count the Raspberry Pi stuff). Just for reference, an Arcom RC-210 + PiIRLP is $565.
One final point: The ID-O-MATIC III doesn't exclude us from moving to other controllers in the future. However, it's true that we're going to need the NHRC-M2SC and the PiIRLP for any controller, so a $38 investment just to get the ball rolling for KD2SL is arguably a good one.
Understanding that the current ARH-351/RC-850 solution has been existence for over 2 decades(?), we must look forward and assume that whatever solution we arrive at during the course of this project must survive and grow with the club for a similar duration of time.
The repeater upgrade was completed in 2014. We elected not to implement the PiRLP module due to the lack if ethernet availability in the elevator shack in Bradfield.
The final configuration of the repeater at that time was as follows:
|http://www.repeater-builder.com/ge/geindex.html#GE-M2-Station||GE Master II Repeater|
|http://www.rollanet.org/~rrars/wp641.pdf||Wacom WP-641 4-cavity Duplexer w/2 additional bandpass cans|